[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論掌中樞要](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831) › 2.80 # 成唯識論掌中樞要 2.80 成唯識論掌中樞要 2.80 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.2.80) 何故四緣三名所依，所緣緣體不名所依，勝者名依，勢相親近，所緣緣疎，是故不立。因則可是，依義則非。 > Why is it that of the four conditions, three are named 'basis' (āśraya), while the substantial entity of the object-condition (ālambana-pratyaya) is not named a basis? That which is superior is called a basis, and its causal force is intimate; the object-condition is distant, and therefore is not established \[as a basis\]. It may well be a cause, but the meaning of 'basis' is not \[applicable to it\]. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.79](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.2.79) - [Next: 2.81](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.2.81) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831~en-mt.2.80) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.2.80](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1831.2.80) · Pramāṇa