[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 1.37 # 成唯識論了義燈 1.37 成唯識論了義燈 1.37 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.1.37) 又《無量義經》云：「能以一音普應眾聲。」即但是詞。又如《婆沙》七十三云：「一音者梵音。」若支那人，來在會坐，謂佛為說支那音義。此通法詞。又云：「貪行者，來在會坐，聞佛為說不淨觀等」。此即唯法，雖各有義，且辨一音，不說所餘。問：隨能聞現，聲各有殊，若據所詮，法各差別，何名一音？ > Furthermore, the Anantamukhanirhāra-sūtra says: 'Able with a single voice to respond universally to all sounds.' This is solely phrasing. Again, as the Vibhāṣā, fascicle seventy-three, says: 'The single voice is the voice of Brahmā. If a person of Cīna comes and sits in the assembly, he thinks the Buddha is speaking the phrasing and meaning of Cīna for him.' This applies to both doctrine and phrasing. It also says: 'When one of greedy conduct comes and sits in the assembly, he hears the Buddha speak the contemplation of impurity and so forth for him.' This is solely doctrine. Although each has its meaning, here we merely distinguish the single voice, not speaking of the rest. Question: Appearing in accordance with those who can hear, the sounds each differ; if in terms of what is expressed, the dharmas each differ; why is it called 'a single voice'? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.1.36) - [Next: 1.38](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.1.38) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.1.37) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.1.37](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.1.37) · Pramāṇa