<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.11 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 2.11

# 成唯識論了義燈 2.11

成唯識論了義燈 2.11

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [2.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.11)

後修道中，數數修習方能斷者，若約伏現於大乘中又悲、智兩增；又怖不怖煩惱有別；又第六識俱生我執。見非見斷總有五釋，如《樞要》辨；又約總別緣蘊生者，次第得果斷之差別，亦作五釋：一、若總若別皆非想，第九品斷，若爾即有却斷下失；二、云總者非想第九品斷，別者地地九品斷。此過有二：若總却斷下失，若別後得不斷惑失；三者、翻前第二釋，亦同前過俱有二失；四、云總別地地各各九品別斷，若爾即有後得不斷惑失；五、云總別各於自地第九品斷。此釋為正，無前二失，修斷數不數准知說之。問：次第聲聞其義何耶？答：小乘諸部互說不同。且依大乘談小果者，謂有聲聞性通利、鈍。於見道前不伏修惑，唯伏見惑入見道時，頓斷三界見道煩惱，得預流果。於見道中斷即離蘊所有我見，三心見道斷之，前後如《樞要》說：從此見道十六心。後在修道中，次第斷其三界九地八十一品修所斷惑。如其所應，得後三果名次第得，斷迷理事五釋如前，數斷數修亦准五說。

> \[Regarding the phrase\] 'in the subsequent path of cultivation, it can only be abandoned through repeated cultivation': if explained in terms of suppressing active manifestations, in the Mahāyāna compassion and wisdom are both intensified; furthermore, there is a distinction between fearing and not fearing afflictions; and there is also the innate self-grasping of the sixth consciousness. Whether it is abandoned by seeing or abandoned by cultivation has five explanations in total, as distinguished in the Shunyao. Furthermore, in terms of arising by taking the aggregates collectively or individually, regarding the distinction of abandonment in the sequential attainment of the fruits, five explanations are also made: First, it is said that whether collective or individual, it is all abandoned at the ninth grade of \[the stage of\] neither-perception-nor-non-perception; if so, there is the fault of subsequently abandoning what belongs to lower stages. Second, it is said that the collective is abandoned at the ninth grade of neither-perception-nor-non-perception, while the individual is abandoned across the nine grades of each and every stage. This has two errors: if collective, the fault of subsequently abandoning lower stages; if individual, the fault that what is subsequently attained does not abandon the affliction. Third, reversing the previous second explanation, it also shares the previous error, having both faults. Fourth, it is said that the collective and individual are separately abandoned in each of the nine grades of each and every stage; if so, there is the fault that what is subsequently attained does not abandon the affliction. Fifth, it is said that the collective and individual are each abandoned at the ninth grade of their own respective stages. This explanation is correct, being free from the previous two faults; whether cultivation and abandonment are repeated or not can be known by applying this. Question: What is the meaning of the sequential śrāvaka? Answer: The various Hīnayāna schools explain this differently. Relying provisionally on the Mahāyāna to discuss the Hīnayāna fruits: it is said that there are śrāvakas whose faculties are either sharp or dull. Prior to the path of seeing, they do not suppress the afflictions of cultivation, suppressing only the afflictions of seeing; when entering the path of seeing, they abruptly abandon the afflictions of the path of seeing of the three realms, attaining the fruit of the srotāpanna. In the path of seeing, abandoning all views of self grasping the aggregates as identical or separate, they abandon them in the three-mind path of seeing; the sequence is as explained in the Shunyao. From this path of seeing of sixteen minds onward, later in the path of cultivation, they sequentially abandon the eighty-one grades of afflictions to be abandoned by cultivation across the nine stages of the three realms. According to what is appropriate, they attain the latter three fruits, which is called sequential attainment. The five explanations regarding the abandonment of \[afflictions\] deluded about principle or phenomena are as before, and repeated abandonment and repeated cultivation are also to be understood in accordance with the five explanations.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 2.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.10)
- [Next: 2.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.12)
- [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.2.11) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.11) · Pramāṇa
