[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 2.26 # 成唯識論了義燈 2.26 成唯識論了義燈 2.26 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.26) 合之與離，但取初合名合，初離名離，已後即非。遠覺所待為彼性者，以能取心勢遠取之名彼。和合句者，令彼地等與德和合，與彼我別，我但令彼覺、樂、苦等九德和合。取，謂先合後離據上下論，行即約在地等。問：何不立眼等識耶？答：即覺等是，餘外道計亦多准此。 > Regarding conjunction (saṃyoga) and disjunction (vibhāga), only the initial combining is called conjunction, and the initial separating is called disjunction; thereafter, it is not. That which relies on distant perception is regarded as 'otherness' (parātva), because the mind capable of grasping takes it from a distance, it is called 'otherness'. The category of inherence (samavāya) causes that earth and the like to inhere with qualities, which is distinct from the self; the self only causes the nine qualities such as cognition, pleasure, and suffering to inhere. Apprehending refers to first conjunction and then disjunction, discussed in terms of above and below; motion (karman) is discussed with respect to earth and the like. Question: Why do they not establish visual consciousness and the like? Answer: Cognition (buddhi) and the like are precisely that; the doctrines of other tīrthikas also mostly follow this. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.25](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.25) - [Next: 2.27](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.27) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.2.26) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.26](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.26) · Pramāṇa