[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 3.12 # 成唯識論了義燈 3.12 成唯識論了義燈 3.12 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.3.12) 問：既依現法，假立過去。云何得言無時名滅？又四十六云：過去行已生已滅，由彼諸行，無因可得，亦無自性。又云：即此已生諸行剎那，自性滅壞，正觀為滅。 > Question: Since the past is nominally established relying on present dharmas, how can it be said that the time of non-existence is called cessation? Furthermore, fascicle 46 says: Past formations have already arisen and already ceased; because for those formations no cause can be obtained, nor is there any intrinsic nature. It also says: It is precisely the intrinsic nature of these moments of already-arisen formations disintegrating that is correctly contemplated as cessation. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.3.11) - [Next: 3.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.3.13) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.3.12) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.3.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.3.12) · Pramāṇa