[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 5.18 # 成唯識論了義燈 5.18 成唯識論了義燈 5.18 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.18) 明不共無明。《攝論》第五云：此於五識無容說有。是處無有能對治故。若處有能治，此處有所治，非五識中有彼能治，於此見道不生起故。此意五識在見道位未成無漏。若有不共無明，即在聖位亦名為醉，與教相違，說異生故，不云聖者亦恒常起。又約菩薩起見道說，爾時第七亦無漏故，非謂二乘所起見道，亦非第六立第七故　問：無性之人既無對治，應總不有？答：是異生故。又此難意，且據有姓起見道說。不爾許五有成事智，應有不共。問：《攝論》復云：亦非染污意識中有，與餘煩惱共相應時，不共無明名不成故。　既爾如何與四或俱，應初師勝？答：彼《論》敘難云：不共無明亦不成就，與身見等恒相應故。自釋云：汝難不平，非我說。彼與餘煩惱不相應，故名為不共。然說彼或餘處所無，故名不共，譬如十八不共佛法，前說與餘煩惱相應名不成者，觀他所立顯彼過故。此意就他薩婆多等云：與餘俱不名不共，顯彼自違故為此難。非我說，與餘或俱時不名不共。 > Clarifying unshared ignorance (āveṇikī avidyā): The fifth fascicle of the Mahāyānasaṃgraha states: "This cannot be admitted to exist in the five consciousnesses. In that place there is no antidote. Where there is an antidote, there is something to be antidoted. There is no such antidote in the five consciousnesses, because in this \[stage\] the path of seeing does not arise." This means that the five consciousnesses in the stage of the path of seeing have not yet become undefiled. If there were unshared ignorance, then even in the noble stage it would be called "intoxication," which contradicts the teachings, for \[the sūtra\] speaks of ordinary persons and does not say that nobles also constantly give rise \[to it\]. Furthermore, this is spoken in reference to a bodhisattva giving rise to the path of seeing, at which time the seventh is also undefiled; it does not refer to the path of seeing generated by the two vehicles, nor does the sixth establish the seventh. Question: Since beings devoid of \[Buddha-\]nature lack an antidote, should it not be completely non-existent in them? Answer: Because they are ordinary persons. Moreover, the intention of this objection is formulated provisionally with respect to those with nature who give rise to the path of seeing. Otherwise, if one admits that the five \[consciousnesses\] have the wisdom that accomplishes activities, they ought to have unshared \[ignorance\]. Question: The Mahāyānasaṃgraha further says: "Nor is it present within the defiled manovijñāna, because when it is associated together with other afflictions, the name 'unshared ignorance' would not be established." Since this is so, how could it be accompanied by the four delusions, meaning the first master's position should be superior? Answer: That Śāstra, in formulating the objection, says: "Unshared ignorance would also not be established, because it is constantly associated with the view of self and so forth." It explains itself: "Your objection is inequitable; it is not that I say it is not associated with other afflictions and therefore is called unshared. Rather, it is said that because that delusion is absent in other places, it is therefore called unshared, just as the eighteen unshared Buddha dharmas \[are unshared\]. What was said earlier—that association with other afflictions makes the name unestablished—was said in observation of what the other established in order to expose their error." The meaning is: taking the position of others like the Sarvāstivādins who say that being accompanied by others is not called unshared, it exposes their self-contradiction, and therefore raises this objection. It is not that I myself say that when accompanied by other delusions it is not called unshared. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.17) - [Next: 5.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.19) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.5.18) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.579) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.18) · Pramāṇa