[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 5.249 # 成唯識論了義燈 5.249 成唯識論了義燈 5.249 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.249](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.249) 今謂不爾。前四受報決定，唯果非業，即不得云業有五種。若云亦業、報決定是俱句者。即是前三，何須別說？又報定受時不定者，是何句收？名當不收。乖者相攝，不見此理。故依本釋，理教無違。 > Now I say this is not so. If the first four were determinate in experiencing retribution, being solely the result and not karma, then one could not say that karma has five kinds. If one says that determination of karma and retribution is the clause of "both," that is simply the first three, so why state them separately? Furthermore, under which clause is that whose retribution is definitely experienced while its time is indefinite subsumed? The term would fail to subsume it. To subsume them while they are in conflict fails to see this principle. Therefore, relying on the original explanation, reason and scripture are without contradiction. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.248](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.248) - [Next: 5.250](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.250) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.5.249) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.249](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.249) · Pramāṇa