[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 5.62 # 成唯識論了義燈 5.62 成唯識論了義燈 5.62 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.62) 問：以羞、恥二為慚、愧體，一體義分則成假，二執本後俱同惠，一體用分應不實，初二靜慮意名喜、樂，為問亦爾？答：同依一惠不別立，約義用別故是實。慚、愧同體既別立，如忘念等故應假。 > Question: If modesty (hrī) and bashfulness (apatrāpya) are taken as the essences of shame and embarrassment, one essence divided by conceptual differentiation would become nominal (prajñaptisat); if fundamental and subsequent graspings are both identical to discernment (prajñā), one essence differentiated by function should not be real (dravyasat); and in the first two dhyānas, the mind being termed joy and pleasure—is it also questioned in this way? Answer: Concurrently relying on a single discernment, they are not separately established; being differentiated according to meaning and function, they are real. Since shame and embarrassment are of identical essence yet separately established, like forgetfulness (muṣitasmṛtitā) and so forth, they should be nominal. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.61) - [Next: 5.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.63) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.5.62) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.62) · Pramāṇa