[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 5.69 # 成唯識論了義燈 5.69 成唯識論了義燈 5.69 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.69) 《論》：猶預為性者本，云即緣理事，俱是疑也。西明云：依諦門釋名他世等，而無事疑說為染污。如疑杌為人皆事中疑，不隱沒無記異熟生攝。《要集》斷云：有釋為勝。此《論》下云：三見及疑，獨頭無明親迷諦故。五十八同。若有事疑，同見取等緣他見等，而《論》不說。今謂不爾，五十八云：謂於他世作用因果等。又前等四云：且疑他世為有為無，於彼有何欲、勝解相，依疑他世等，是事非理，云迷理事。本《疏》不說疑杌為人亦煩惱疑。若以諦攝，何法非諦？嗔餘愛等迷別事生，亦應是理，瞋、愛所緣亦諦攝故。 > The Treatise states: "Its nature is hesitation." The root text states that \[hesitation\] directed toward principle (yukti) or facts (vastu) alike is doubt (vicikitsā). Ximing says: "Explaining it in accordance with the gate of the truths refers to the next world and the like; whereas doubt regarding factual matters is not said to be defiled. For example, doubting whether a post is a man is entirely doubt regarding factual matters, and is subsumed under non-obscured indeterminate nature and retribution-born factors." The Yaoji judges: "Some explanations are superior. Later in this Treatise it says: 'The three views, doubt, and independent ignorance directly confuse the truths.' Fascicle 58 agrees. If there were doubt regarding factual matters, it would be like view-attachment and so forth taking other views as object, yet the Treatise does not say so." / Now I say this is not so. Fascicle 58 states: "Namely, regarding the next world, function, cause, and effect, etc." Furthermore, the earlier \[fascicle\] states regarding the four: "Temporarily doubting whether the next world exists or not, what desire or resolute determination aspect does one have toward it?" Depending on doubt about the next world, etc., these are factual matters, not principle, which is why it is called confusing principle and facts. The root Commentary does not say that doubting a post to be a man is defiled doubt. If they are subsumed under the truths, what phenomenon is not a truth? Anger and other forms of attachment arising in confusion about particular facts would also have to be principle, because the objects of anger and attachment are also subsumed under the truths. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.68) - [Next: 5.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.70) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.5.69) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.69) · Pramāṇa