[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 5.70 # 成唯識論了義燈 5.70 成唯識論了義燈 5.70 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.70) 疑惠為體，西明釋云：三因成之。《要集》云：准後師破。有釋順文，今謂不爾。訓釋證中云：末底、般若義無異故者，轉釋末底。不爾有疑毘助末底，何得是惠？故轉解云：末底、般若義無別故，若將般若為第三因，有何所以？ > Taking understanding (mati) as the substance of doubt, Ximing explains: "Three reasons establish this." The Yaoji says: "By reference to the subsequent master's refutation, some explanations conform to the text." Now I say this is not so. In the citation of the proof by etymology, it says: "Because mati and prajñā have no difference in meaning"—this is a further explanation of mati. Otherwise, if there is doubt as to how vi- modifying mati could be understanding, he therefore further explains: "Because mati and prajñā have no difference in meaning." If one were to take prajñā as the third reason, what rationale would there be? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.69) - [Next: 5.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.71) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.5.70) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.5.70) · Pramāṇa