<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.6.6 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 6.6

# 成唯識論了義燈 6.6

成唯識論了義燈 6.6

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.6.6)

《論》：「一切種子識。」西明云：能引自類及引同時自類現行，是因緣性。即自問云：若爾，如何牽引種子為因緣性？解云：實非因緣，然菩薩地假名因緣，因緣類故。今謂不爾，遠望當現名為牽引，未潤等種自類相生，亦是此因，故名因緣。

> The treatise: "The all-seed consciousness (sarvabījakavijñāna)." Ximing states: 'Being able to induce its own category and induce simultaneous actual occurrences of its own category is the nature of direct cause (hetupratyaya).' He then asks himself: 'If so, how can the seeds that are drawn forth be of the nature of direct cause?' He explains: 'In reality they are not direct causes, but the Bodhisattvabhūmi nominally designates them as direct causes because they belong to the same category as direct causes.' Now I say this is not so: looking distantly toward future actual occurrences, they are called 'drawing forth' (saṃskāra/ākṣipta); seeds that have not yet been moistened, generating their own category, are also causes of this type, hence they are called direct causes.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.6.5)
- [Next: 6.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.6.7)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.6.6) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.6.6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.6.6) · Pramāṇa
