[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 7.12 # 成唯識論了義燈 7.12 成唯識論了義燈 7.12 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.12) 問：若爾，何故說三性教為第三時？應第二時，在空前故。又准《深密》，同坐一經，非前、後故。 > Question: If so, why is the teaching of the three natures called the third period? It should be the second period, because it precedes emptiness. Furthermore, according to the Saṃdhinirmocana, they occur in the same assembly of one sūtra and are not prior and posterior. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.11) - [Next: 7.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.13) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.7.12) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.12) · Pramāṇa