<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.16 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 7.16

# 成唯識論了義燈 7.16

成唯識論了義燈 7.16

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [7.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.16)

若爾，復違《法華》等教，以為漸悟第二說空，第三空、有，如何得言為漸悟故後時說空？

> If so, this again contradicts the Lotus Sūtra and other teachings, which take emptiness as the second expounded for gradual enlightenment and emptiness and existence as the third; how can one say that for gradual enlightenment emptiness is expounded later?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 7.15](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.15)
- [Next: 7.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.17)
- [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.7.16) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.16](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.16) · Pramāṇa
