[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 7.198 # 成唯識論了義燈 7.198 成唯識論了義燈 7.198 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.198](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.198) 《論》：「定學有四」等。西明云：「舊法師判：初之四地，五、六、七地，八、九、十地、金剛喻定及佛，四定如次。雖引古釋，更無別判。」今謂：不然。何者若定有四，即別配地？戒、惠亦多，何不配地？故知隨分，地地皆修。 > Regarding the treatise's statement, "The training in concentration has four kinds," etc.: Ximing says: "Former masters determined: the first four grounds; the fifth, sixth, and seventh grounds; the eighth, ninth, and tenth grounds, the diamond-like concentration, and Buddhahood—the four concentrations correspond to them sequentially. Although citing the ancient explanation, he made no other determination." I now say: This is not so. Why? If there are four concentrations, would they be specifically allocated to the grounds? Morality and wisdom are also many; why are they not allocated to the grounds? Therefore, we know that according to one's portion, all are cultivated ground by ground. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.197](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.197) - [Next: 7.199](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.199) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.7.198) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.198](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.198) · Pramāṇa