[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 7.215 # 成唯識論了義燈 7.215 成唯識論了義燈 7.215 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.215](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.215) 問：四無礙解，何故前三同為一障，第四獨為一障？答：前三無礙雖體有三，緣境各一，無多行解。第四體一，解行分多，謂即七辨。又云：前三是因，第四是果，故三、一障而有差別。 > Question: Regarding the four unhindered knowledges, why are the first three together one obstruction, while the fourth alone is one obstruction? Answer: Although the first three unhindered knowledges have three essences, each has one cognitive object and does not possess multiple understandings. The fourth has a single essence, but its understandings and activities are divided into many, namely the seven elocutions. Also, it is said: The first three are causes and the fourth is a fruit; therefore there is a difference between three and one obstruction. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.214](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.214) - [Next: 7.216](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.216) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.7.215) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.215](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.215) · Pramāṇa