[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 7.57 # 成唯識論了義燈 7.57 成唯識論了義燈 7.57 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.57) 《論》：「法空智品與俱起故」，此破安惠。然《疏》云「第七有法執，法空智起即不行；第八法執有，法空智起此應滅」者，是破餘師，非安惠師。或寫者誤。若破安惠，應云：第七有我執，生空智起即不行；第八法執有，法空智起此應滅。 > The Treatise says: "Because it arises concurrently with the category of dharma-emptiness wisdom." This refutes Sthiramati. However, the commentary says: "The seventh \[consciousness\] has dharma-grasping, and when dharma-emptiness wisdom arises, it immediately ceases to function; the eighth has dharma-grasping, and when dharma-emptiness wisdom arises, this ought to be eradicated." This refutes other masters, not Master Sthiramati. Or it is a scribal error. If refuting Sthiramati, it should say: "The seventh has self-grasping, and when person-emptiness wisdom arises, it immediately ceases to function; the eighth has dharma-grasping, and when dharma-emptiness wisdom arises, this ought to be eradicated." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.56](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.56) - [Next: 7.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.58) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.7.57) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [成唯識論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1830.9.418) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.57](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.57) · Pramāṇa