[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 7.73 # 成唯識論了義燈 7.73 成唯識論了義燈 7.73 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.73) 或翻譯謬，魏、梁、隋、唐同本異譯，餘本總無，故筆授謬。《大品經》云「墮頂菩薩墮聲聞、辟支佛地」者，或學觀所取似頂，名墮頂；或本二乘，在於頂位迴心向大，亦名菩薩，故云墮頂菩薩。說此等退，墮二乘地，於理無違。然《本業》、《大品》更撿彼文。 > Or else, it is a translation error: the translations of the Wei, Liang, Sui, and Tang are different translations of the same text, but other texts lack this altogether, so it is an error in the transmission of the brush. When the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra states that "a bodhisattva fallen from the peak falls into the stage of the śrāvaka and pratyekabuddha," it is either that when learning contemplation, the grasped object resembles the peak, so it is termed "fallen from the peak"; or that originally one was of the two vehicles, and while at the peak stage turned one's mind toward the Mahāyāna, and was also termed a bodhisattva, hence called a "bodhisattva fallen from the peak." That such beings regress and fall into the stage of the two vehicles does not contradict reason. However, regarding the Benye jing and the Pañcaviṃśatisāhasrikā, those texts should be further examined. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.72](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.72) - [Next: 7.74](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.74) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.7.73) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.73](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.73) · Pramāṇa