<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.8 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832) › 7.8

# 成唯識論了義燈 7.8

成唯識論了義燈 7.8

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [7.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.8)

又《深密經》中，勝義生菩薩不牒前說三性為問，但舉世尊先說諸蘊、諦等善巧，何故復立一切諸法皆無自性？明不是前先說三性。今外舉經難此前說，故論主答：不違彼教，後說無性。

> Furthermore, in the Saṃdhinirmocana Sūtra, Bodhisattva Paramārthasamudgata did not bring up the previously expounded three natures as his question, but merely cited the World-Honoured One's earlier teachings on skill regarding the aggregates, truths, and the like, asking why he again established that all dharmas are without self-nature. This clarifies that the three natures were not expounded earlier. Now an outsider cites the sūtra to object to the previous explanation here, so the author of the Śāstra answers that he does not contradict that teaching, having expounded naturelessness later.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 7.7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.7)
- [Next: 7.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.9)
- [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832~en-mt.7.8) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.7.8) · Pramāṇa
