[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 1.42 # 成唯識論演祕 1.42 成唯識論演祕 1.42 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.42) 問：論本若有「一」、「頞」二言，前後三藏可隨取一想乎？梵本未必無二字，如何得言「隨取一」耶？ > Question: If the root treatise has the two words \*i-\* and \*a-\*, could the earlier and later Tripiṭaka Masters simply take whichever one they thought? The Sanskrit text does not necessarily lack both words; how can it be said that they "simply took one"? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.41) - [Next: 1.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.43) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.1.42) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.42) · Pramāṇa