[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 1.49 # 成唯識論演祕 1.49 成唯識論演祕 1.49 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.49) 答：有三釋：一云，諸佛法同，離於諸佛所說法外，法無可說名不說也。二云，一切諸法皆如為性，真如離言，名不說法；又無如外法可說故，總名不說。三云，如眼等法性自本有，不由說已而方有故，故云不說。更有餘釋，如《法苑》決擇。 > Answer: There are three explanations. One says: The Dharma of all Buddhas is identical; apart from the Dharma spoken by all Buddhas, there is no Dharma that can be spoken, which is called "not speaking." The second says: All dharmas have Suchness as their nature, and True Suchness is beyond words, which is called "not speaking the Dharma"; furthermore, because there is no Dharma outside of Suchness that can be spoken, it is collectively called "not speaking." The third says: Phenomena such as the eye have an intrinsically existing nature that does not come to exist only after being spoken; therefore, it is said "not spoken." There are further explanations, as determined in the Fayuan \[yilin zhang\]. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.48](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.48) - [Next: 1.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.50) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.1.49) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.49](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.49) · Pramāṇa