[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 1.51 # 成唯識論演祕 1.51 成唯識論演祕 1.51 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.51) 答：約詮義分三性可爾；今論實體，染即不然。餘難准釋。 > Answer: In terms of designation, dividing the three natures conceptually is acceptable; but here we discuss the real substance, and defilement is certainly not so. The remaining objections are resolved accordingly. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.50](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.50) - [Next: 1.52](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.52) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.1.51) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.51](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.51) · Pramāṇa