<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.551 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 1.551

# 成唯識論演祕 1.551

成唯識論演祕 1.551

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.551](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.551)

問：若言俱生修道斷者，與《楞伽經》豈不相違？按四卷經第二說云：「大惠！身見有二種：謂俱生及妄想，須陀洹人二種身見斷故，疑法不生。」十卷第四文意大同。

> Question: If one says that the innate is abandoned in the path of cultivation, does this not contradict the Laṅkāvatāra-sūtra? The second fascicle of the four-fascicle sūtra says: "Mahāmati, there are two kinds of view of personal identity: innate and conceptualized. Because a srotāpanna has abandoned both kinds of view of personal identity, doubts concerning phenomena do not arise." The meaning of the text in the fourth fascicle of the ten-fascicle version is largely the same.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.550](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.550)
- [Next: 1.552](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.552)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.1.551) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.2.14) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.551](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.551) · Pramāṇa
