<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.67 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 1.67

# 成唯識論演祕 1.67

成唯識論演祕 1.67

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.67)

汎科文意略有四種：一、分別不同科；二、義類相從科；三、以文從義科；四、以義依文科。今即初義。據實本、釋兩師造論，而意一種。今依別義判二令異云：本論師為令含識斷障得果；釋論師者，令法久住，利樂有情。

> Generally, the headings organizing the intent of a text are of four kinds: 1. division according to differing discriminations; 2. division according to grouping similar doctrinal categories; 3. division subordinating text to doctrine; 4. division basing doctrine on text. The present case is the first meaning. In truth, the root author and the commenting masters composed their treatises with one single intent. Here, based on a distinct meaning, we divide the two to differentiate them, saying: the master of the root treatise \[composed it\] to lead sentient beings to sever obstacles and attain the fruit; the masters of the commentaries \[composed them\] to cause the Dharma to abide long and to benefit and gladden sentient beings.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.66](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.66)
- [Next: 1.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.68)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.1.67) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.1.67) · Pramāṇa
