[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 2.126 # 成唯識論演祕 2.126 成唯識論演祕 2.126 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.126](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.126) 答：傳有兩釋：一云：瓶、盆等相雖識頓變，然唯是形，故說名假。今說所緣識頓變者，意顯色故，故實非假。言一相者，理實是形，今以形色標於色相，必無有違。二云：瓶等頓變但四境相，故四境實說為瓶等，故名為假。後說為勝。 > Answer: Two explanations are traditionally transmitted. One says: Although aspects like jars and basins are transformed suddenly by consciousness, they are merely shape; hence they are said to be designated. Now, saying that the objective condition is suddenly transformed by consciousness refers to color-matter; hence it is substantially real and not designated. As for "a single aspect," in principle it is indeed shape; now by labeling the aspect of matter using shape-matter, there is certainly no contradiction. The second says: The sudden transformation of jars and the like is merely the aspects of the four objective domains; hence the four real domains are designated as jars and the like, and thus called designated. The latter explanation is superior. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.125](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.125) - [Next: 2.127](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.127) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2.126) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.126](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.126) · Pramāṇa