[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 2.466 # 成唯識論演祕 2.466 成唯識論演祕 2.466 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.466](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.466) 詳曰：有宗所成五塵雖實，塵合成瓶，瓶等是假。《疏》說彼瓶為和合假，不說所成五塵為假。又《疏》說云：實極微法而不能遮，不和合故。明知所成既是和合，許是能遮，一何妄破？又此疏初而以四句辨宗別，云薩婆多麁細皆實，豈可前後自柕楯耶？《疏》文文約而義包也。 > Examination: Although the five sensory objects that are constituted in the Sarvāstivāda school are real, when atoms aggregate to form a jar, the jar and the like are nominal. The Commentary says that their jar is a nominal entity of aggregation, not that the five sensory objects that are constituted are nominal. Furthermore, the Commentary states: "The real dharmas of infinitesimal atoms cannot obstruct, because they are not aggregated." Thus it is clear that since what is constituted is an aggregation, it is admitted to be able to obstruct; why make such a reckless refutation? Moreover, at the beginning of this Commentary, the four propositions are used to distinguish the sectarian tenets, stating that in the Sarvāstivāda both the coarse and the subtle are real; how could it contradict itself before and after? The text of the Commentary is concise, yet its meaning is comprehensive. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.465](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.465) - [Next: 2.467](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.467) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2.466) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.466](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.466) · Pramāṇa