[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 3.118 # 成唯識論演祕 3.118 成唯識論演祕 3.118 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.118](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.118) 有說：業感六識之中，有勝有劣，劣不能熏。論言不熏而據劣者，若以論文無所簡別，總說不熏，亦應法執，非能熏攝，名異熟故，故知業感勝者能熏。勝者是何？謂受三分。捨受俱者，唯是劣故，故非能熏。苦、樂受俱，名行相勝，是能熏也。或捨受中復分三種，違、順、中容，中容不熏，餘二能熏。復有說云：此中但遮第八心品，六識異熟無非能熏，無別聖教說不熏故。八無所熏，可非能熏；六有所熏，無不熏者。又，心、心所若非能熏，即是所熏，何有心法非能、所熏？ > Some say: Among the six consciousnesses produced by karma, there are superior and inferior ones; the inferior cannot perfume. When the Treatise says they do not perfume, it refers to the inferior ones. If one assumes that because the text of the Treatise makes no distinction, it speaks generally of not perfuming, then grasping at dharmas should also not be subsumed under perfuming agents because it is termed 'maturation'; therefore, we know that the superior among those produced by karma can perfume. What are the superior ones? That is, feeling is divided into three: those associated with neutral feeling are solely inferior, and therefore cannot perfume; those associated with painful or pleasurable feeling are designated as having superior ākāras, and are perfuming agents. Or again, neutral feeling is subdivided into three types: disagreeable, agreeable, and indifferent; the indifferent does not perfume, while the other two can perfume. Others say: Here it only negates the mental factors of the eighth \[consciousness\]; none of the matured states of the six consciousnesses are non-perfuming agents, because there is no other holy teaching stating that they do not perfume. Since the eighth has no perfumed \[locus\], it may well not be a perfuming agent; but the six do have a perfumed \[locus\], so none fail to perfume. Furthermore, if a citta or caitasika is not a perfuming agent, it must be that which is perfumed; how could there be a mental dharma that is neither the perfuming nor the perfumed? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.117](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.117) - [Next: 3.119](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.119) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.3.118) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.118](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.118) · Pramāṇa