<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.29 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 3.29

# 成唯識論演祕 3.29

成唯識論演祕 3.29

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [3.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.29)

問：何故前難分別論者性相同耶？

> Question: Why did it previously object to the Vibhajyavādin that their nature and characteristics are identical?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 3.28](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.28)
- [Next: 3.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.30)
- [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.3.29) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.29) · Pramāṇa
