[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 3.62 # 成唯識論演祕 3.62 成唯識論演祕 3.62 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [3.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.62) 詳曰：餘釋有違，理如前破，因生後果。今略答云：以落謝因生後果，因無後果可不生。現因體用既非無，後果有因起何失？餘難類思。 > Detailed analysis says: The other explanation has flaws, as refuted above with respect to a cause producing a subsequent fruit. Now I briefly answer: If a ceased cause produced a subsequent fruit, then when the cause is absent the subsequent fruit might indeed not arise. But since the substance and function of the present cause are not non-existent, what fault is there in the subsequent fruit having a cause and arising? Other objections may be considered by analogy. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 3.61](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.61) - [Next: 3.63](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.63) - [Up: 3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.3.62) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.62](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.3.62) · Pramāṇa