<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.167 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 4.167

# 成唯識論演祕 4.167

成唯識論演祕 4.167

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.167)

問：不相應據自三無，何故前云諸有為法皆託此因，豈不相應非有為耶？

> Question: Conditioned dharmas non-associated \[with mind\], according to our own \[tenet\], lack all three \[bases\]. Why did it say earlier that 'all conditioned phenomena rely on this condition'? Are non-associated \[dharmas\] not conditioned?  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.166](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.166)
- [Next: 4.168](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.168)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.4.167) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.167) · Pramāṇa
