<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.30 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 4.30

# 成唯識論演祕 4.30

成唯識論演祕 4.30

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.30)

詳曰：觀前文勢，明自宗致無對他意，依七、八識辨隨自言想亦何咎？若言前文，並對於他，故除七、八。辨識食體，亦應但六，如何即云第八為體？由此定委前文是自對七、八言，理無爽矣。

> Examination: Observing the trend of the preceding text, it explains the principles of our own school without the intention of confronting other schools. What fault is there in explaining that they follow one's own assertions based on the seventh and eighth consciousnesses? If one says that the preceding text is entirely directed against others and therefore excludes the seventh and eighth, then in determining the essence of consciousness-nutriment, it should also only be six; why then does it state that the eighth is its essence? Hence, it is certain that the preceding text was spoken by oneself in relation to the seventh and eighth, and this principle is without error.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.29](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.29)
- [Next: 4.31](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.31)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.4.30) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.30](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.30) · Pramāṇa
