[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 4.94 # 成唯識論演祕 4.94 成唯識論演祕 4.94 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [4.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.94) 釋曰：外又救云：和合意識別生意識，前後間起，亦不違經無同類並。故復破云：和合識體許是異熟，若間生者，體便間斷。若爾，後續應名更生。故量破云：和合意識不應間生；許是異熟故；猶如報色。又異熟體唯恒相續，更無異趣。 > The exposition states: The opponent again saves \[their thesis\] by saying: 'The blending mental consciousness and the separately arising mental consciousness arise alternately with interruptions before and after; this also does not contradict the sūtra's prohibition against the simultaneous arising of the same category.' Hence it is refuted again: 'The entity of the blending consciousness is conceded to be retribution; if it arose with interruptions, its entity would be interrupted. If so, subsequent linking would have to be called being reborn anew.' Therefore, a syllogistic refutation is framed: The blending mental consciousness should not arise with interruptions; because it is conceded to be retribution; like retribution materiality. Furthermore, the entity of retribution is only constantly continuous, having no other destiny. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 4.93](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.93) - [Next: 4.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.95) - [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.4.94) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.94](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.94) · Pramāṇa