<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.9 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 4.9

# 成唯識論演祕 4.9

成唯識論演祕 4.9

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.9)

詳曰：理雖可爾，明教難違。故《瑜伽》云：「若諸段物於吞咽時，令心歡喜，諸根悅豫，當於爾時不名段食，但名觸食。若受用已，安隱消變，增長喜樂，於消變時乃名段食。若有熟變不能長養諸根安樂，彼雖熟變不名段食。若諸段物於吞咽時不生歡喜，亦不能令諸根悅豫，當於爾時都不名食。」文既鄭重而簡略之，何得會云就勝且說？又《瑜伽》等望長諸根，資益變壞方名為食，暫除飢、渴，未益諸根變壞、消化，食義焉在？由斯理故不為之取。

> Examination: Although this principle might seem so, clear teachings are hard to contradict. Thus the Yogācārabhūmi says: 'If material substances, at the time of swallowing, cause the mind to be joyful and the faculties delighted, at that time it is not called material nutriment, but only contact-nutriment. If after consumption they are peacefully transformed and digested, increasing joy and pleasure, then at the time of transformation and digestion it is called material nutriment. If there is cooking and transformation that cannot nourish the well-being of the faculties, though it undergoes transformation, it is not called material nutriment. If material substances at the time of swallowing do not produce joy, nor can they cause the faculties to be delighted, at that time it is not called nutriment at all.' Since the text is so deliberate in distinguishing this, how could one reconcile it by saying that it speaks provisionally in terms of the superior? Furthermore, in the Yogācārabhūmi and so forth, it is called nutriment only in view of nourishing the faculties, benefiting, transforming, and breaking down; if it merely removes hunger and thirst temporarily without yet benefiting the faculties through transformation, breakdown, and digestion, where is the meaning of nutriment? For this reason, we do not accept it.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 4.8](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.8)
- [Next: 4.10](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.10)
- [Up: 4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.4.9) — English, machine translation

## Linked texts (1)

- [成唯識論了義燈](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1832.4.60) — Classical Chinese

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.9](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.4.9) · Pramāṇa
