[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 5.3 # 成唯識論演祕 5.3 成唯識論演祕 5.3 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.3) 有義：難云：受等依心起受等，名心所；心依受等生，應名受等所。又，受等四義具受等，名心所；心亦四義具，應名受等所。如《疏》以彼二、三義簡。然《疏》中說應名心所，此即不然，既以心王望受等說，如何仍說名作心所？ > One explanation objects: Sensation and so forth arise in dependence on the mind, and sensation and so forth are called mental factors (caitasika); the mind arises in dependence on sensation and so forth, so it should be called a "factor of sensation, and so forth." Moreover, sensation and so forth possess the four meanings, so sensation and so forth are called mental factors; the mind also possesses the four meanings, so it should be called a "factor of sensation, and so forth." As the Commentary excludes them by means of those two or three meanings, yet the Commentary states that \[the mind\] should be called a mental factor—this is not correct: since it is spoken of by setting the primary mind against sensation and so forth, how could it still be said to be called a "mental factor"? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.2) - [Next: 5.4](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.4) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.5.3) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.3](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.3) · Pramāṇa