[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 5.435 # 成唯識論演祕 5.435 成唯識論演祕 5.435 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [5.435](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.435) 具如《疏》明。又《阿含經》云：有沙門、婆羅門作如是見，起如是論。一云：我身四大從父母生，孔鋪長養，然是無常。二云：此我不得名斷滅，我欲界諸天，斷滅無餘。三：此非斷滅，色界化生，諸根具足，斷滅無餘。四：此非斷滅，我無邊空處斷滅乃至非想，皆後非前立為斷滅。 > This is fully explained in the Commentary. Furthermore, the Āgama-sūtras say: There are śramaṇas and brāhmaṇas who hold such views and propound such theories. The first says: 'This self of mine consists of the four great elements, is born of father and mother, and is nourished by food and drink; yet it is impermanent.' The second says: 'This \[gross\] self cannot be called annihilation; my \[self\] in the heavens of the desire realm is annihilated without remainder.' The third \[says\]: 'This is not annihilation; \[the self\] born apparitionally in the form realm, possessing all sense faculties, is annihilated without remainder.' The fourth \[says\]: 'This is not annihilation; my \[self\] in the sphere of infinite space is annihilated, up to the sphere of neither-perception-nor-non-perception.' All of them establish the subsequent, not the preceding, as annihilation. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 5.434](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.434) - [Next: 5.436](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.436) - [Up: 5](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.5.435) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.435](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.5.435) · Pramāṇa