[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 6.12 # 成唯識論演祕 6.12 成唯識論演祕 6.12 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [6.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.12) 詳曰：識若有六，喻豈得成？所喻四蘊體計一故。若了別同，約位分六，體實別者，應所比蘊蘊義是同，約位分四，體應各別，同能喻識。由斯過故，故計體一，縱非本計，然為前難故轉計也，況復經論明一心詩。 > Carefully evaluated: If there are six consciousnesses, how could the simile be established? Because the substance of the four aggregates that are the illustrated subject is posited as one. If they are identical in cognition, differentiated into six according to stages, but in reality their substances are distinct, then the aggregates compared would have the same meaning of aggregate and be differentiated into four according to stages, so their substances ought to be distinct respectively, just like the consciousnesses that serve as the simile. Because of this error, they posit that their substance is one. Even if this was not their original position, they modified their thesis in response to the preceding objection, not to mention that sūtras and treatises explain the poem of one citta. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 6.11](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.11) - [Next: 6.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.13) - [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.6.12) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.12) · Pramāṇa