<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.202 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 6.202

# 成唯識論演祕 6.202

成唯識論演祕 6.202

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.202](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.202)

釋曰：言順結等而釋外難，外難意云：准長行釋與彼頌文，何故不次？故答彼言約順結頌，取義相屬故，文隔越亦不相違，其文隔越對看可悉，先因後果名之為順。又云：似若無境，無似色境，有境亦無，能有彼境顛倒之心名為有境。

> The explanation is: The words 'in conformity with concluding \[verses\]' explain an external objection. The external objection means: Comparing the prose explanation with that verse text, why are they not in sequence? Therefore, he answers him: In reference to conforming with the concluding verse, taking their meanings as interrelated, the separation of the text is not contradictory either. When the separated text is viewed side by side, it can be understood; putting cause first and fruit after is called 'conforming'. It also says: 'If the resembling \[form\] lacks an object', that is, there is no object resembling form; 'that which possesses the object also does not exist', that is, the inverted mind capable of possessing that object is called 'possessing the object'.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.201](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.201)
- [Next: 6.203](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.203)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.6.202) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.202](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.202) · Pramāṇa
