<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.253 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 6.253

# 成唯識論演祕 6.253

成唯識論演祕 6.253

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [6.253](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.253)

具如《疏》明。有義：人物等質雖體是有，水鏡等法能帶己相然無彼質，水鏡亦有；彼質但能生鏡等影，不生鏡等。非但生影名之為緣，要生能照方名緣故，故質非是鏡等所慮，亦非所託，是故應以二義雙簡。

> This is fully explained as in the Commentary. There is an opinion: Although the substantial entity (mūla-dharmin) such as a person or object exists as a substantial entity, phenomena such as water and mirrors can bear their own aspects; yet without that substantial entity, water and mirrors still exist. That substantial entity is only able to produce the image in the mirror and so on, but does not produce the mirror itself. It is not merely producing an image that is called a 'condition'; only when it must produce that which can illuminate is it called a 'condition.' Therefore, the substantial entity is not that which is cogitated by the mirror and the like, nor is it that which is relied upon. For this reason, one should distinguish them by both of these two meanings.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 6.252](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.252)
- [Next: 6.254](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.254)
- [Up: 6](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.6.253) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.253](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.6.253) · Pramāṇa
