<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.100 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 7.100

# 成唯識論演祕 7.100

成唯識論演祕 7.100

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [7.100](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.100)

詳曰：非無此理。然下攝云「隨相攝」者，流轉、苦、集前二性攝。既云「隨相」，明不違理，據增而談。《顯揚》復云「於染淨法」，淨法不言依世間淨。由斯教理，《疏》說無違。又《疏》下云「流轉唯約有漏故」者，談彼《瑜伽》明流轉也。

> Detailed analysis: It is not without this rationale. However, when the subsumption below states 'subsumed according to characteristics', transmigration, suffering, and origination are subsumed under the former two natures. Since it says 'according to characteristics', it is clear that it does not contradict the principle, being spoken from the perspective of predominance. The Prakaraṇāryavācā further says 'with regard to defiled and pure dharmas', and pure dharmas are not specified as based on mundane purity. Due to this teaching and reasoning, what the Commentary says does not conflict. Moreover, when the Commentary below says 'transmigration is only in terms of what is sāsrava', it is speaking of the Yogācārabhūmi's elucidation of transmigration.  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 7.99](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.99)
- [Next: 7.101](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.101)
- [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.7.100) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.100](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.100) · Pramāṇa
