[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 7.114 # 成唯識論演祕 7.114 成唯識論演祕 7.114 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.114](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.114) 若以《攝論》名、義二體攝此五法，名、義體者便成相違。何以故？五法中，義即相、分別，體即依他。彼義初性，以無攝有，豈不相違？ > If one takes the two substances of name and referent in the Mahāyānasaṃgraha to subsume these five dharmas, the substances of name and referent would then become contradictory. Why? Among the five dharmas, referent is mark and discrimination, and its substance is the dependent nature. That referent \[in the Mahāyānasaṃgraha\] is the first nature; if non-existence were to subsume existence, how would that not be contradictory? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.113](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.113) - [Next: 7.115](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.115) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.7.114) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.114](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.114) · Pramāṇa