[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 7.96 # 成唯識論演祕 7.96 成唯識論演祕 7.96 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.96](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.96) 問：《中邊頌》云：「於不動無倒，謂知義非有，非無如幻等，有無不動故。」以幻喻等喻計所執。二論既差，各有何意？ > Question: A verse in the Madhyāntavibhāga says: 'In unmovingness and non-distortion, / it is known that the referent is non-existent, / yet not non-existent like an illusion, etc., / because of unmovingness in existence and non-existence.' It takes the metaphor of an illusion and so forth to illustrate the imagined nature. Since the two treatises diverge, what are their respective intentions? > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.95](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.95) - [Next: 7.97](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.97) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.7.96) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [金光明最勝王經疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1788.4.488) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.96](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.96) · Pramāṇa