[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › 7.99 # 成唯識論演祕 7.99 成唯識論演祕 7.99 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [7.99](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.99) 《瑜伽》、此論二文不同，如《疏》中會。有義：有為有二：一、四相所遷，因等所為；二、煩惱所為。今言「有為」，依後義說，故「有為」言但說緣起。此說為勝，下文攝中二性攝故。然《顯揚》云：於染淨法，思惟諸行流轉實性。據世間淨，故不相違。 > The texts of the Yogācārabhūmi and this treatise differ, as reconciled in the Commentary. There is an opinion: Conditioned phenomena are of two kinds: first, that which is shifted by the four marks and produced by causes and conditions; second, that which is produced by afflictions. Here, speaking of 'conditioned' is based on the latter meaning; hence the term 'conditioned' only refers to conditioned arising. This explanation is superior, because in the subsumption below, it is subsumed under two natures. However, the Prakaraṇāryavācā says: with regard to defiled and pure dharmas, one contemplates the real nature of the transmigration of all formations. It is based on mundane purity, so they do not contradict each other. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 7.98](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.98) - [Next: 7.100](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.100) - [Up: 7](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.7.99) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.99](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.7.99) · Pramāṇa