[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833) › [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt) › 2.167 # 成唯識論演祕 2.167 English (machine translation) 2.167 - **Language:** English ### [2.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2.167) Detailed analysis: Looking up at this conclusion, its logic is indeed rich! Yet scriptural proofs are scarce. Now, relying on the great school, I shall roughly distinguish right from wrong. The atom of intrinsic nature briefly has five faults: First, the fault of lacking doctrinal evidence. When the Great Dharma King governs the world, those who are confused resolve their doubts through his golden words; when superior beings conceal their light, the perplexed settle doubts through jade tablets. What is recorded in jade tablets may be held and honored on the crown of one's head; what arises from human opinion is inherently hesitant and untrustworthy. The doctrine now established is completely absent from the holy teachings; what should students rely on to believe and enter it? Second, the fault of contradicting the holy teachings. According to fascicle fifty-four of the \*Yogācārabhūmi\*: - [Previous: 2.166](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2.166) - [Next: 2.168](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2.168) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2) ## Linked texts (1) - [成唯識論演祕](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833.2.167) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2.167](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1833~en-mt.2.167) · Pramāṇa