[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [唯識二十論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834) › 1.287 # 唯識二十論述記 1.287 唯識二十論述記 1.287 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.287](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.1.287) 述曰：由有唯識無計所執，入法無我，非是一切種唯識等亦無，能入法無我。所以者何？撥有性故。依他、圓成二性是有，若說為無，便是邪見，撥於有性，故此不能入法無我。許有唯識，無計所執，名為正見，入法無我，不撥於有，名處中道，契真正理，此意即違清辨等也。 > The Commentary says: One enters the selflessness of phenomena by there being vijñapti-mātra and no conceptually grasped \[nature\], not by vijñapti-mātra and the rest also being non-existent in every mode that one is able to enter the selflessness of phenomena. Why is this? Because that would be repudiating existent nature. The two natures—the other-dependent and the fully perfected—are existent; if one asserts them to be non-existent, that is wrong view, repudiating existent nature, and therefore one cannot enter the selflessness of phenomena. Accepting that there is vijñapti-mātra and that there is no conceptually grasped \[nature\] is called right view; entering the selflessness of phenomena without repudiating existence is called abiding in the middle path and tallying with the true, correct principle. This meaning directly contradicts Bhāviveka and others. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.286](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.1.286) - [Next: 1.288](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.1.288) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834~en-mt.1.287) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.1.287](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.1.287) · Pramāṇa