[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [唯識二十論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834) › 2.59 # 唯識二十論述記 2.59 唯識二十論述記 2.59 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.59) 述曰：阿耨色以上諸大聚色可有相合，有方分故，可成六分。聚色亦成，即顯聚合許有方分。極微無合，無分義成，《俱舍論》云：「又和合色許有分故，相觸無失」，觸之與合，義一名異，此名為聚色，彼名和合色。 > The Commentary says: From aṇu-form upwards, all coarse aggregate forms can have conjunction; because they have spatial divisions, they can form six divisions. Aggregate forms are also established, which shows that aggregated conjunction is accepted to have spatial divisions. Paramāṇus have no conjunction, so the meaning of partlessness is established. The \*Kośa\* says: 'Furthermore, because composite forms are accepted to have parts, there is no fault in their touching.' 'Touching' and 'conjunction' have the same meaning with different names; here it is called 'aggregate form' (jùsè), and there it is called 'composite form' (héhésè). > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.58](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.58) - [Next: 2.60](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.60) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834~en-mt.2.59) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.59](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.59) · Pramāṇa