[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [唯識二十論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834) › 2.68 # 唯識二十論述記 2.68 唯識二十論述記 2.68 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.68) 述曰：初二句牒；下二句詰。若異極微有諸聚色，可言聚合極微合無。既異極微諸聚非有，言聚有合，其合者誰？「誰」者問也，問聚合者體是誰也。助立量云：聚應無合；即極微故；猶如極微。極微應合；即諸聚故；猶如聚色。 > The Commentary says: The first two phrases restate \[the premise\]; the latter two phrases interrogate it. If apart from paramāṇus there were aggregate forms, one could say the aggregate conjoins while paramāṇus have no conjunction. Since apart from paramāṇus aggregates do not exist, when you say the aggregate has conjunction, who is it that conjoins? 'Who' is a question, asking what the substance of that which conjoins in the aggregate is. To assist, an anumāna is formulated: 'Aggregates should have no conjunction; because they are identical to paramāṇus; just like paramāṇus. Paramāṇus should have conjunction; because they are identical to aggregates; just like aggregate forms.' > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.67](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.67) - [Next: 2.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.69) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834~en-mt.2.68) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.68](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.68) · Pramāṇa