[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [唯識二十論述記](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834) › 2.70 # 唯識二十論述記 2.70 唯識二十論述記 2.70 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.70) 述曰：此非正救，以彼師宗許聚合故，言聚無合，是設為救。若諸聚色展轉但有無間生至，假名為合，不相逼近，名無合者，彼師亦說。 > The Commentary says: This is not their orthodox defense, because that school's tenet accepts that aggregates conjoin; saying that aggregates have no conjunction is a hypothetical defense. If aggregate forms mutually merely arise contiguously without intervals, being metaphorically termed 'conjoined', and not pressing against each other is called 'having no conjunction', that master also says this. > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.69](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.69) - [Next: 2.71](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.71) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834~en-mt.2.70) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.70](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1834.2.70) · Pramāṇa