<!-- Pramāṇa, a library of Indian primary sources · https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.35 -->

[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837) › 1.35

# 大乘百法明門論疏 1.35

大乘百法明門論疏 1.35

- **Language:** Classical Chinese

### [1.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.35)

問曰：「眼等五識既不緣假，何故諸論色塵之中說有長等假色，乃至觸塵之中說有滑等假觸？」

> Question: "Since the five consciousnesses, eye and the rest, do not cognize nominal \[objects\], why do various treatises say within visual objects that there are nominal forms such as long, and even within tactile objects that there are nominal touches such as smooth?"  
> — English (machine translation) (machine translation)

- [Previous: 1.34](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.34)
- [Next: 1.36](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.36)
- [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1)

## Translations (1)

- [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837~en-mt.1.35) — English, machine translation

---
Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.35](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.35) · Pramāṇa
