[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837) › 1.42 # 大乘百法明門論疏 1.42 大乘百法明門論疏 1.42 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.42) 「又一釋云：『眼等五識，假實並緣。若緣於假，必緣其實，緣實之時，不緣於假。所以者何？假依實有，緣假之時，其必緣實；實不依假，緣實之時，不緣於假。』此家所說諸假法等，非法處中遍計性攝。如長等假色，即色處中收，乃至觸塵之中滑等假，觸處中攝，第六意識緣一切法，如其所應隨義應知。 > "Another explanation states: 'The five consciousnesses, eye and the rest, cognize both the nominal and the real. When cognizing the nominal, they necessarily cognize the real; when cognizing the real, they do not cognize the nominal. Why is this? The nominal exists dependent upon the real; when cognizing the nominal, one must cognize the real. The real does not depend upon the nominal; when cognizing the real, one does not cognize the nominal.' The nominal dharmas spoken of by this school are not subsumed under the conceptually constructed nature within the base of mental objects. For instance, nominal forms such as long and short are included within the base of visual form, up to nominal touches such as smooth among tactile objects being subsumed within the base of tactile objects. The sixth, mano-vijñāna, cognizes all dharmas, which should be understood accordingly as appropriate." > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 1.41](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.41) - [Next: 1.43](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.43) - [Up: 1](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837~en-mt.1.42) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.42](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.1.42) · Pramāṇa