[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837) › 2.13 # 大乘百法明門論疏 2.13 大乘百法明門論疏 2.13 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.13) 論云：「問：『是諸善法，幾世俗有？幾實物有？』答：『三是世俗有，謂不放逸、捨、及不害。』所以者何？不放逸、捨是無貪、無嗔、無癡、精進分故，即如是法離雜染義，建立為捨；治雜染義，立不放逸。不害即是無嗔分，故無別實物。煩惱六中，五是實有，謂貪、嗔、癡、慢、疑。一是假有，謂不正見。」 > The treatise says: “Question: ‘Among these wholesome dharmas, how many are conventionally existent? How many are substantially existent?’ Answer: ‘Three are conventionally existent: apramāda, upekṣā, and ahiṃsā.’ Why is this? Apramāda and upekṣā are portions of alobha, adveṣa, amoha, and vīrya; for in the sense of these dharmas being detached from defilement, they are established as upekṣā; and in the sense of their remedying defilement, they are established as apramāda. Ahiṃsā is simply a portion of adveṣa, and therefore has no separate substantial entity. Among the six kleśas, five are substantially existent: rāga, pratigha, moha, māna, and vicikitsā. One is conventionally existent: improper view (dṛṣṭi).” > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.12](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.12) - [Next: 2.14](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.14) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837~en-mt.2.13) — English, machine translation ## Linked texts (1) - [瑜伽師地論](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.sanskrit.darsana.yogacara.yogacarabhumi*zh-xuanzang.55.59) — Classical Chinese --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.13](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.13) · Pramāṇa