[Pramāṇa](https://indike.org/pramana/) › [Indian literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in) › [Buddhist Literature](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha) › [Taishō Tripiṭaka (Chinese Buddhist canon)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho) › [大乘百法明門論疏](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837) › 2.18 # 大乘百法明門論疏 2.18 大乘百法明門論疏 2.18 - **Language:** Classical Chinese ### [2.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.18) 解云：「無癡善根但對治癡，如無貪、無嗔、但對治貪嗔，別更無行相。《對法論》中，就行相以釋無癡，非謂無癡善根則是慧性。若從此義，心所有法五十一中，三十是實有，餘皆是假有，言三十是實有者，謂遍行五，別境五，善八，加無癡，根本煩惱五，除不正見，隨煩惱七，合此三十是實有，餘是假有。」 > The explanation says: “The wholesome root of amoha merely remedies moha, just as alobha and adveṣa merely remedy rāga and pratigha, having no further distinct aspect (ākāra). In the Abhidharmasamuccaya, it explains amoha in terms of its aspect, not meaning that the wholesome root of amoha is identical in nature to prajñā. If one follows this meaning, among the fifty-one caitta-dharmas, thirty are substantially existent and the rest are all conventionally existent. When it says thirty are substantially existent, it refers to the five sarvatragas, five viniyatas, eight kuśalas plus amoha, five root kleśas excluding improper view, and seven upakleśas; combining these thirty, they are substantially existent, and the rest are conventionally existent.” > — English (machine translation) (machine translation) - [Previous: 2.17](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.17) - [Next: 2.19](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.19) - [Up: 2](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2) ## Translations (1) - [English (machine translation)](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837~en-mt.2.18) — English, machine translation --- Source: [https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.18](https://indike.org/pramana/in.bauddha.taisho.1837.2.18) · Pramāṇa